CASES THAT SHOW THAT TANIA MCCASH ‘S INCARCERATION IS PERSECUTION & ILLEGAL:

http://caught.net/prose/immunity.htm

 In Caught.net & The Pro Se Way, former Phoenix, AZ Attorney Robert A. Hirschfeld, states:

  1. Cooper v. O’Conner, 99 F.2d 133.

“There is a general rule that a ministerial officer who acts wrongfully, although in good faith, is nevertheless liable in a civil action and cannot claim the immunity of the sovereign.”

 

  1. Rankin v. Howard, (1980) 633 F.2d 844, cert den. Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct. 2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326.

“When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction, or acts in the face of clearly valid statutes expressly depriving him of jurisdiction, judicial immunity is lost.”

In  Rankin v. Howard, 633 F.2d 844 (1980) “the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed an Arizona District Court dismissal based upon absolute judicial immunity, finding that both necessary immunity prongs were absent…”

 

  1. …later, in Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1072 (1986),

“the Ninth Circuit, en banc , criticized the “judicial nature” analysis it had published in Rankin as unnecessarily restrictive. But Rankin’s ultimate result was not changed, because Judge Howard had been independently divested of absolute judicial immunity by his complete lack of jurisdiction.”

 

  1. Stump v. Sparkman, id., 435 U.S. 349.

“Some Defendants urge that any act “of a judicial nature” entitles the Judge to absolute judicial immunity. But in a jurisdictional vacuum, (that is, absence of all jurisdiction) the second prong necessary to absolute judicial immunity is missing.”

 

  1. Piper v. Pearson, 2 Gray 120, cited in Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 20 L.Ed. 646 (1872)

“Where there is no jurisdiction, there can be no discretion, for discretion is incident to jurisdiction.”

 

  1.   Davis v. Burris, 51 Ariz. 220, 75 P.2d 689 (1938)

“A judge must be acting within his jurisdiction as to subject matter and person, to be entitled to immunity from civil action for his acts.”

 

  1. Gregory v. Thompson, 500 F2d 59 (C.A. Ariz. 1974)

“Generally, judges are immune from suit for judicial acts within or in excess of their jurisdiction even if those acts have been done maliciously or corruptly; the only exception being for acts done in the clear absence of all jurisdiction.”

 

  1.  Little v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 217 Miss. 576, 64 So. 2d 697(2011)

“When a judicial officer acts entirely without jurisdiction or without compliance with jurisdiction requisites he may be held civilly liable for abuse of process even though his act involved a decision made in good faith, that he had jurisdiction.”

 

  1. Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137 (1803)

“… the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle that a law repugnant to the constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.”

 

  1. Ableman v. Booth, 21 Howard 506 (1859).

“No judicial process, whatever form it may assume, can have any lawful authority outside of the limits of the jurisdiction of the court or judge by whom it is issued; and an attempt to enforce it beyond these boundaries is nothing less than lawless violence.”

 

  1. Hoffsomer v. Hayes, 92 Okla 32, 227 F 417.

“The courts are not bound by an officer’s interpretation of the law under which he presumes to act.”

 

 

Advertisements

PLEASE, FREE A MOTHER OF THREE & FILL OUT THIS FORM TO REMOVE CORRUPT JUDGE STEPHEN V. MANLEY FROM OFFICE:

TANIA MCCASH’S ORDEAL WITH HER RAILROADING JUDGE (STEPHEN V. MANLEY):

 

TO FILE A COMPLAINT FORM AGAINST AN ABUSIVE, PREJUDICED JUDGE FOR SENDING A MOTHER OF THREE TO JAIL FOR COMMITTING NO CRIME:

Download the form:

https://cjp.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/2016/08/complaintform-fillable-1.pdf

 

 

  1. Judge Steven V. Manley, is Oppressive, Revengeful, & presents a clear showing of prejudice against females, and those that come before his court as alleged “Pro se Litigants”. He exhibits the inability/disability to discharge the duties of his office to impartially & unbiased; to separate the drug defendants from defendant No. 1 from defendant No 293.

 

  1. When litigants choose to be “Pro Se” due to the failure of their attorney to bring their skills to their defense, the said Manley and the Public Defender at the time of the case enact a sinister plot of entrapment to Misuse & Abuse the Incompetent to Stand Trial procedures for the improper purpose of retaliating against those litigants for rejecting that office.

 

  1. Judge Stephen handles alleged “Pro Se(s)” in a very prejudicial & discriminatory manner within his courtroom. Judge Manley deceptively tells “Pro se(s)” that they cannot discharge their Public Defenders because they have been deemed incompetent, and they have to keep them.

 

  1. Subsequently, the Public Defender Attorney ABANDONS the client, and Judge Manley, then, condemns the Defendant to state custody and imprisonment without the benefits & Choice of Counsel. This is a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to Counsel; which is a Criminal Official Act & Misconduct within itself.

 

  1. The Acts of Judge Stephen V. Manley is a clear abuse of his discretion, a direct conflict of constitutional safeguards, and the guaranteed protections of Defendants’ substantive rights that come before him. Judge Manley is a DANGER to the very community he is supposed to serve and swore to protect.

 

  1. Judge Manley’s actions are Egregious and unbecoming behavior and attitudes of a Public Official. We, the People, are highly concerned that such a person sits at the seat of judgment of anyone.

 

  1. We the People, demand a full investigation into the actions, Maltreatment, and prejudicial discrimination against alleged “Pro Se Litigants” that come before him in his court. This is true especially in his blatant distainment of one litigant Tania Rosemary McCash bearing Criminal Case No.: C_1653807.

 

  1. The Law is very clear: that one cannot be condemned to Jail without the representation of an attorney 2. to allow Public Defenders and it’s Office to Abandon a Defendant is a Clear Travesty of Justice, and 3. to add insult to injury; to imprison a Defendant for Exercising a Constitutional Protected Right is an Assault & Battery on her person. This is an unattainable Plain Error of the Court that cannot STAND.

 

  1. We the People DEMAND that Judge Stephen V. Manley be REMOVED FROM OFFICE EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY & THE POLITICAL PRISONER Tania Rosemary McCash be set Free Immediately and removed from his TYRANNY effective immediately.

 

  1. Judge Stephen V. Manely is oppressive; retaliatory; treats women differently than men; doesn’t treat everyone the same way; discriminates and retaliates against Pro Se litigants; deceives Pro Se defendants into believing that they are being represented by public defendants (so, he can send them to jail illegally).
  2. Judge Manley is dangerous and detrimental to the community at large. His actions are egregious and unbecoming of that of a public official. We, The People and concerned citizens, are witnesses to the travesty of justice (criminal activity, unlawful behavior of a public official who makes a mockery of the constitution and our legal system while in court).
  3. Judge Manley is the personification of willful misconduct while in office. Therefore, we DEMAND an immediate investigation of this “judge” for egregious and unbecoming acts of this public official to vent his spleen and retaliate against an alleged Pro Se litigant: Tania McCash.
  4. This mother or three is retaliated against, by the said judge, for merely exercising her constitutional and legal right to file papers and defend herself.

“JUDGE” MANLEY’S ACTS ARE CRIMINAL WITHING THEMSELVES AND HE MUST BE REMOVED.

 

 

 

Phone Blitz and Protest for Tania McCash!


PROTEST FOR Tania MCCASH [A MOTHER OF THREE]
Please join us for the latest information on our Facebook page FreeTaniaMcCash

https://www.facebook.com/186136932269347/

We would really appreciate you getting as many people to help me call these numbers tomorrow for Tania McCash. They don’t have to give their names or any information out. They could just say that they are Concerned Citizens.
Here is the Scribed that I want you all to read below & the Numbers you should call for this script are:
1. The Judicial Performance Commission: (415) 357-1200
2. The Jail where she is: (408) 299-2306
Ask the name of, and to Speak to, the Warden.
Tell them it’s about the Case ofTania R. McCash vs. Judge Stephen V. Manely and other judges, whom unlawfully arrested her after her filing of this complaint.
3. The President Judge Deborah A. Ryan: (408) 882-2700.
Tell her
(1) she has rouge Judges at the Bench who are threatening the Safety of the Community by ruling outside the rules of law and
(2) violating the People’s rights when they complain against them.
Mrs. Tania R. McCash is now unlawfully imprisoned for the very same reason after she DISQUALIFIED Judge Manely, and we Demand her release.
Thank you for your help in advance. It would be nice if we can get people to call the prison today; but if Not we really need to start this First thing tomorrow morning.
What to say when People make calls to Get Tania Out of Jail:
FREE TANIA MCCASH. NO ONE WANTS TO LIVE UNDER THE YOKE OF A TYRANT’S RULE. JUDGE MANELY IS AN ABUSE ROUGE TYRANT JUDGE AND THE PEOPLE DON’T NEED OR WANT HIM SITTING AT THE SEAT OF JUDGMENT.
THIS MOTHER OF THREE [CHILDREN] HAS BEEN UNLAWFULLY IMPRISONED BY HIM FOR HER EXERCISING HER RIGHTS GUARANTEED TO BE PROTECTED BY THE CONSTITUTION WHICH CAN NOT BE CONVERTED BY THIS SO CALLED “JUDGE” INTO A “CRIME” AND WE DEMAND HER FREEDOM IMMEDIATELY!
TANIA MCCASH FILED A DISQUALIFICATION OF THIS JUDGE AND COMPLAINED TO THE JUDICIAL COMMISSION ON PROFESSIONALISM AND HE HAS BEEN SITTING FOR (2) WEEKS TO RETALIATE AGAINST HER BY THROWING HER IN PRISON FOR SPEAKING TO PROTECT HERSELF IN OPEN COURT.
FOR THE RECORD, THIS IS BARRATRY. A COMPLETE ABROGATION OF SUBSTANTIVE RIGHTS AND VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH. YOU AS OUR PUBLIC OFFICIAL MUST PUT A STOP TO THIS ROUGE JUDGE FOR HE IS A CRIMINAL, AN ENDANGERMENT TO THE PEOPLE, AND THE COMMUNITY HE “SERVES.”
RELEASE TANIA MCCASH NOW, FREE TANIA MCCASH, FREE TANIA MCCASH.
4. If you believe in God and freedom of speech, please, file this complaint against “Judge” Manely. Fax it or mail it to the address at the end of this form:

Red Alert! Tania McCash locked up again without bail! Judge Manley has lost his jurisdiction and still will not leave her alone.

Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 4 PM – 6 PM PST

Dial-in number (US): (515) 604-9779
Access code: 808188#
International dial-in numbers: https://fccdl.in/i/courtroomwatch
Online meeting ID: courtroomwatch
Join the online meeting: https://join.freeconferencecall.com/courtroomwatch

For 24/7 Customer Care, call (844) 844-1322

 
 
 
 

Red Alert! Tania McCash locked up again without bail! Judge Manley has lost his jurisdiction and still will not leave her alone.

Tania McCash, a single mother of three, is locked up again by a corrupt judge who refuses to relinquish jurisdiction! Tania sued Judge Stephen Manley in federal court, and although the court did not grant her lawsuit she did get the case transferred to Alameda County and out of Judge Manley’s Santa Clara County court. This provision was in the federal court order, and Judge Manley refuses to honor the change of venue. In defiance of the federal court order, Judge Manley continues to force Tania into his courtroom. It must be repeated, there is no criminal charge against Tania. There has been no arrest, no indictment, no investigation, no trial, no sentencing, and no appeal. Judge Manley simply remanded her to jail. Since the federal court transferred the case from Santa Clara County to Alameda County, Judge Manley has no jurisdiction and therefore no immunity in this case. Tania must go free. To make this matter more oppressive, Judge Manley is denying Tania any bail whatsoever. Even worse than that, Manley has not scheduled another appearance for Tania for an entire month. During this time, she will be in one of the most dangerous jails in the country. Judge Manley has remanded her to jail for no apparent reason other than she made the statement that she was exercising her constitutionally-protected right to remain silent under the 5th amendment. As soon as Tania made the statement “I am taking the 5th”, Manley replied “Remanded!”, and she was immediately taken to jail. To make it perfectly clear, the judge is making no criminal charge or accusation. So the specific reason for her incarceration has not been made clear by the court. This is clearly a matter of a judge seeking revenge on a defendant who sued him. Our combined efforts led to Tania’s release a few months ago. And we ask everyone to come to her assistance again. Remember, she is a very effective legal advocate who has assisted numerous innocent people, so helping her is helping others as well. Tania is suffering in one of the most dangerous jails in the country and we need everyone to call on her behalf the following numbers: 
 
Judge Stephen Manley 408-491-4840 smanley@scscourt.gov

Sheriff Laurie Smith 408-299-2311 so.website@shf.sccgov.org

Chief Judge Phyllis Hamilton 510-637-1296 PJHpo@cand.uscourts.gov

Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone 415-614-5500

 

 

Find Your Representative

San Jose Office

635 North First Street Suite B
San JoseCA 95112
Phone: (408) 271-8700
 

is located in the 19th Congressional district of California.
The representative for this district is:
 
 Zoe Lofgren 
Democrat
Go to website Go to contact form
 
 

Santa Clara County Sheriff & Jail – murders, assaults, & other scandals:

https://www.sfchronicle.com/crime/article/23-year-old-man-found-dead-inside-San-Jose-s-13310950.php

https://www.sfchronicle.com/crime/article/Report-Three-correction-officers-arrested-in-6483015.php

https://www.sfchronicle.com/crime/article/Santa-Clara-County-inmate-found-dead-in-jail-cell-13440619.php?src=hp_totn

https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/09/28/santa-clara-county-pays-365000-settlement-to-beaten-jail-inmate/

https://www.mercurynews.com/2016/02/05/santa-clara-county-jail-scandal-two-more-guards-suspected-of-beating-inmate-put-on-leave/

https://www.kqed.org/news/11702978/a-sheriffs-race-worth-watching-in-santa-clara-county

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
For complaints about the Judicial Council’s
services—Judicial Council meetings, forms, or
other translated material hosted on
http://www.courts.ca.gov — do not use this form. Please
go to http://www.courts.ca.gov/languageaccess.htm to
submit your complaint.

Complaint Form – California Courts

The California courts want all Californians, including those who do not speak English well, to have access to the courts. If you have a complaint about language access services at a local court, or if you would like to provide feedback about language access services, fill out and turn in the complaint form.

Click here to download free PDF: Complaint Form-Complaint-ENG

 

Below we show in documents that Tania McCash is not crazy but has been effectively helping other Single Parents with court cases and this is why the courts have medically kidnapped Tania McCash.


TANIA MCCASH county claim & risk management

To see County claim & risk management PDF form County Claim Form April 5th 2018 (1)

10827886_136411963371881_2852799150124369650_o

More proof that Tania Mccash is not crazy but helping other Single Moms to fight corrupt Courts.

On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 1:29 PM, TANIA MCCASH wrote:

Fw: 2 DOCUMENTS TO BE FILE STAMPED BY THE COURT CLERKS

Re: …. I am not a licensed attorney. I am not your attorney. I did not receive any payment in any form for the following document. I did not ask for any payment in any form for the following document.
I have provided a pleading, similar to my own pleadings and affidavit statements. (which I have previously filed into the public record)
I do not and will not take any responsibility for your personal court filings of your own court cases.
 
You may remove or add what is most appropriate for your case. Affidavit’s are truth only.
instructions: for the following AFFIDAVIT pleading
you will make 3 copies which the court will stamp, one to file into the court, 2 get stamped by the court clerk and are your file copies.
 
additional documents: to be file stamped by the court
POS=PROOF OF SERVICE
 
you will need to go the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, court website and download  AND fill out a proof of service form.
 
you will also need an additional PROOF OF SERVICE attachment for all those who will be added to the form. The proof of service typically provides only space for ONE RECEIVER.
 
the type of proof of service you will need will state both: PERSONAL SERVICE AND MAIL SERVICE (your court may provide many options for proof of service, you will need to research and download only the POS whcih has both mail and personal service)
YOU WILL CHECK BOTH BOXES
 
receivers on PROOF OF SERVICE- ONCE file stamped
 
Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn & court address – personal service (drop off ONE COPY at administration services)
when you drop off judges copy, tell them that you have already filed the document and would like them to stamp your copy for your records (have them stamp ONE court filed copy that you got back at the time they stamped filed it) THIS IS YOUR COPY… DO NOT LOSE IT
 
 
District Attorney & address – personal service ( you will follow the same instructions as with the judge drop off) have them stamp ONE of  the same documents that has been filed by the court
if they ask questions, all you have to say is… the document has been filed… “i have an appointment and am running late…. please stamp my copy for my records”  ‘thank you” and leave.
 
Your attorney & address – personal service (drop off ONE COPY) do not need to get anything stamped
Just walk in, politely drop it off.. if they ask questions, just say, “it has been filed and this is your copy…… thank you”  and walk away
do not answer any questions… JUST LEAVE
 
GUARDIAN AD LIDEM – personal service (drop off ONE COPY)
same instructions
 
FBI Inspections Division – mail service (one copy) USE TRACKING… IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT…. SEND IT FEDEX …. LEAST EXPENSIVE 3 DAYS
935 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20535
 

CUSIP Number

CUSIP stands for Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures.  A CUSIP number identifies most financial instruments, including: stocks of all registered U.S. and Canadian companies, commercial paper, and U.S. government and municipal bonds.  The CUSIP system (formally known as CUSIP Global Services)—owned by the American Bankers Association and managed by Standard & Poor’s—facilitates the clearance and settlement process of securities.

CUSIP numbers consist of nine characters (including letters and numbers) that uniquely identify a company or issuer and the type of financial instrument.  A similar system is used to identify foreign securities (CUSIP International Numbering System or CINS).  CINS employs the same nine character identifier as CUSIP, but also contains a letter in the first position to signify the issuer’s country or geographic region.

For more information about how the CUSIP process works, you can contact CUSIP Global Services at (212) 438-6500 or visit its website.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SOLANGE MARTINEZ
174 Willow Street, Apt. B6
Waterbury, CT 06710
Home/Fax: (347) 721- 9255
Cell (914) 619 – 8362
Skype: Solange2583
 
[Excuse my delay, but, after speaking to Eric over the phone yesterday, my computer started “acting up” and couldn’t finish this until now].
 
Quotations for Tania’s Habeas Corpus:
 
In Caught.net & The Pro Se Way,former Phoenix, AZ Attorney Robert A. Hirschfeld, states:
1. Cooper v. O’Conner, 99 F.2d 133.
“There is a general rule that a ministerial officer who acts wrongfully, although in good faith, is nevertheless liable in a civil action and cannot claim the immunity of the sovereign.”
 
2. Rankin v. Howard, (1980) 633 F.2d 844, cert den. Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct. 2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326.
“When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction, or acts in the face of clearly valid statutes expressly depriving him of jurisdiction, judicial immunity is lost.”
 
In Rankin v. Howard, 633 F.2d 844 (1980) “the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed an Arizona District Court dismissal based upon absolute judicial immunity, finding that both necessary immunity prongs were absent…”
 
 
3. …later, in Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1072 (1986),
“the Ninth Circuit, en banc , criticized the “judicial nature” analysis it had published in Rankin as unnecessarily restrictive. But Rankin’s ultimate result was not changed, because Judge Howard had been independently divested of absolute judicial immunity by his complete lack of jurisdiction.
 
 
4. Stump v. Sparkman, id., 435 U.S. 349.
“Some Defendants urge that any act “of a judicial nature” entitles the Judge to absolute judicial immunity. But in a jurisdictional vacuum, (that is, absence of all jurisdiction) the second prong necessary to absolute judicial immunity is missing.”
 
5.Piper v. Pearson, 2 Gray 120, cited in Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 20 L.Ed. 646 (1872)
“Where there is no jurisdiction, there can be no discretion, for discretion is incident to jurisdiction.”
 
 
6. Davis v. Burris, 51 Ariz. 220, 75 P.2d 689 (1938)
“A judge must be acting within his jurisdiction as to subject matter and person, to be entitled to immunity from civil action for his acts.”
 
7. Gregory v. Thompson, 500 F2d 59 (C.A. Ariz. 1974)
 

“Generally, judges are immune from suit for judicial acts within or in excess of their jurisdiction even if those acts have been done maliciously or corruptly; the only exception being for acts done in the clear absence of all jurisdiction.”

 

More links about Santa Clary County:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPm_CbpE_e4 – Santa Clara County sheriff deputies (female sheriff deputies are called Matrons, I read);

https://www.gangstalkingmindcontrolcults.com/to-the-fbi-with-photos-members-of-the-santa-clara-county-branch-of-the-organized-jewish-satanic-pedophile/ – lotta background on Santa Clara County organized crime involving government

Sheriff Laurie Smith was born and raised in Lansing, Michigan til she finished high school, according to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laurie_Smith). In Laurie’s birthplace Lansing, some Satanists wanted to have a Satanic holiday display just this past Christmas: https://www.mlive.com/news/2018/12/satanic-group-plans-to-resurrect-holiday-display-at-michigan-capitol.html (note the name Larissa Wolf of the member of the West Michigan Friends of the Satanic Temple, like the name of Pennsylvania governor Tom Wolf; also the passage Isaiah 11:6 of the Bible has been changed in apparently every version of every Bible on Earth from “The lion will dwell with [or lie down with] the lamb” to “The wolf will dwell with [or lie down with] the lamb”)

Larissa Wolf, a member of the West Michigan Friends of the Satanic Temple, said she wanted to make sure Satan was represented this year. […]
 
Wolf’s Satanic group is in its infancy – just a year old. They want to pick up where the Satanic Temple of Detroit, the creators of the Snaketivity display, left of.
“We greatly respected and admired the original Snakevity,” Wolf said.
The Snaketivity featured a red sake coiled around a black cross with a pentagram on it with a sign that read: “The Greatest Gift is Knowledge.” It was created in 2014 by the Satanic Temple’s Detroit chapter as a way to start a conversation about the separation of church and state, according to previous MLive stories. […]
 
Wolf and her group decided to create a new Satanic display: The Star of Reconciliation. The statue, which is being created by the New Hampshire art studio Technically Timeless, features a bust of Baphomet, a demonic horned goat commonly seen in Satanic iconography. […]
 
Baphomet won’t be alone at the Capitol. The demon goat will be joined by baby Jesus. Once again, state Sen. Rick Jones is making sure there’s a traditional nativity to strike a counterbalance with the presence of the prince of darkness.

 

https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/11/28/admiration-or-antagonism-bay-area-satanic-groups-christmas-in-the-park-tree-pilfered/ – DOWNTOWN San Jose SATANICALLY-DECORATED CHRISTMAS TREE

Daniel Walker of Satanic Bay Area said the group’s roughly 7-foot-tall tree had to be redecorated after many of its 140 satanic-themed, mostly handmade ornaments were pilfered over the weekend.

“We’re fairly certain that people are taking them out of admiration rather than antagonism,” Walker said.

[…] Any organization can apply to decorate a tree. There are no restrictions beyond a vague prohibition on the use of offensive language.

 

[…] Walker said Satanic Bay Area was founded in 2015 as a grassroots atheistic group to create community and left-wing political action for Satanists in the South Bay and beyond.

 

[…] There have been other thefts at the event. In fact, thieves also have targeted Christian symbols.

[…]

“If this keeps up, we might have to put some kind of curse on the new ones — or maybe just stick something gross on the backside,” he said. “We haven’t decided yet.”

CHRISTMAS IN THE PARK SITE - SAYS FAMILY-ORIENTED

 

 
 
 
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Chief District Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Oakland Courthouse, Courtroom 3 – 3rd Floor
1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94612
Weekly Court Calendar Schedule
Criminal Law & MotionWednesdays1:30 p.m.
Civil Law & MotionWednesdays9:00 a.m.
Staff
Calendar Clerk & Courtroom DeputyKelly J. Collins510-637-1296
pjhcrd@cand.uscourts.gov
Civil Case Docketing & Docket CorrectionsCynthia Lenahan510-637-3538
Cynthia_Lenahan@cand.uscourts.gov
Criminal Case DocketingJessie Mosley510-637-3536
Chambers 510-637-1296
Email for Proposed Orders:PJHpo@cand.uscourts.gov
Email for PDF Follow-Ups and
     and Criminal Docket Corrections:
Cynthia_Lenahan@cand.uscourts.gov (Civil)
CRIMpdf@cand.uscourts.gov (Criminal)
Media Liaison  
For all media inquiries:Lynn Fuller
Lynn_Fuller@cand.uscourts.gov
 
This is the official Twitter page for the Santa Clara County Office of the Sheriff. Sheriff Laurie Smith.  PLEASE DIAL 9-1-1 or (408) 299-2311.  https://twitter.com/SCCoSheriff County, CA sccsheriff.org
 
 

Also call the Archbishop of San Francisco Salvatore Cordileone, no joke, 415-614-5500. Salvatore Joseph Cordileone is an American prelate of the Roman Catholic Church and the archbishop of San Francisco, California. Cordileone has become known for his outspoken opposition to same-sex civil marriage and LGBT adoption. Wikipedia His dioceses are claiming jurisdiction right on their websites sfarchdiocese.org! So intervene on Tania’s behalf, now !

Archbishop Salvatore J. Cordileone  San Francisco      415-614-5500

Official Portrait of Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone

Ask Judge Manley 408-491-4840 Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Stephen Manley presides over drug and mental health court, Ask why he keeps resurfacing to attack Tania even though the case was transferred to another county . Remind him of Federal rules of procedure 12 B: he has no jurisdiction over Tania . Ask who gets the money from the performance bond . Ask about his relationship with the vicar general . Ask if he has ever taken the Kol-Nidre oath..THE OATH THAT NULLIFIES In America’s court system, we rely on the assumption that all parties, are telling the truth. Without the truth, justice would be impossible to obtain. Imagine that someone taking an oath to, “tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God,” had previously taken another oath nullifying all of his oaths! Bizarre concept? Read on. Kol-Nidre oath.. The first communal prayer service of Yom KippurKippur Actually takes place immediately prior to sunset on the evening of Yom Kippur. This service is called Kol Nidrei(“All Vows”). These are the first words of a special legal formula that is recited at the beginning of this service and is chanted three times. This legal ritual is believed to have developed in early medieval times as a result of persecutions against the Jews. At various times in Jewish history, Jews were forced to convert to either Christianity or Islam upon pain of death.

Kol Nidre – Fathers’ Manifesto

fathersmanifesto.net/kolnidre.htm

(This is known as the KOL NIDRE (All Oaths) OATH. … How can one trust a Jewish judge, or a Jewish politician, who takes an oath to protect the Constitution of …

The Oath That Nullifies

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/…/CourtProceedings&Masonic&JewishOaths.htmIs the judge hearing this matter a Mason? 3. Is/are the owner or owners of ‘G.E. Corp.’ Mason’s? 4. Has anyone involved in this matter taken an oath of “Kol Nidre …

Complaint Form – California Courts

The California courts want all Californians, including those who do not speak English well, to have access to the courts. If you have a complaint about language access services at a local court, or if you would like to provide feedback about language access services, fill out and turn in the complaint form.

Click here to download free PDF: Complaint Form-Complaint-ENG

(b) How to Present Defenses. Every defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading if one is required. But a party may assert the following defenses by motion:

(1) lack of subject-matter jurisdiction;

(2) lack of personal jurisdiction;

(3) improper venue;

(4) insufficient process;

(5) insufficient service of process;

(6) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and

(7) failure to join a party under Rule 19.

A motion asserting any of these defenses must be made before pleading if a responsive pleading is allowed. If a pleading sets out a claim for relief that does not require a responsive pleading, an opposing party may assert at trial any defense to that claim. No defense or objection is waived by joining it with one or more other defenses or objections in a responsive pleading or in a motion.

Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Stephen Manley 408-491-4840

screen-shot-2016-07-10-at-3-24-14-pm-840x420


courtroomwatch.com




 
 
 
 
#LIFE, #STYLE, ALAMEDA COUNTY, ARCHBISHOP SALVATORE CORDILEONE, ASSAULTS, CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA COURTS ,CHIEF JUDGE PHYLLIS HAMILTON, COMPLAINT FORM, COOPER V. O’CONNER, CUSIP NUMBER, DC 20535, JUDGE MANLEY, JUDGE STEPHEN MANLEY, JUDICIAL COUNCIL JUSTICE, LAW ,LEGAL, ADVOCATE, MEDICALLY KIDNAPPED, MURDERS, NEWS, POLITICAL,PRO SE, RANKIN V. HOWARD, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, SHERIFF LAURIE SMITH, SINGLE PARENTS, SOLANGE MARTINEZ, TANIA MCCASH,TRUMP, TRUTH,USA, WASHINGTON
 
 

A witness protection program for Truth, Liberty and Justice for all! Psalm 94:16 Who will rise up for me against the evildoers? or who will stand up for me against the workers of iniquity?

%d bloggers like this: